.

Ward 1 Candidate Question of the Week: Reserve Funds

Ward 1 Gulfport City Council candidates David Hastings and Dan Liedtke answer our fifth Gulfport Patch 'Candidate Question of the Week.'

Voters will head to the polls March 13 to decide who will represent them as Gulfport City Council member for Wards 1 and 3.

To help inform the community, Patch will publish a City Council candidate Question of the Week for both wards.

Below, you will find the answers for the Ward 1 Candidates: David Hastings and Dan Liedtke.

Gulfport Patch Question of the Week: "Where do you stand on using General Fund Reserves to balance the City’s Operating Budget?"

David Hastings

"I do not agree with using General Reserve funds to balance the budget. The City Council passed Resolution 2003-11 in 2003 requiring the City to maintain an amount in the General Fund Reserves equal to 25% of the previous years budget. That 25% reserve can only be used for an emergency as authorized by sections 310 and 311 of the City Charter. In 2003 we had over $7 million in reserves with an operating budget of some $8 million. Ever since 2003 our budgeted expenses have exceeded our budgeted income and the previous councils have used the reserves as one component to help offset the deficits. As a result today we stand with only $4.5 million dollars in reserves on a $10 million dollar budget or 44% which is still above the 25% mandated by Resolution 2003-11 but $3.5 million less than it was in 2003.  

A 25% reserve or three months of operating expenses is well below what lenders require when seeking loans either on a personal or business basis. Many lenders require up to twelve months operating cash on hand. Why then would government be different especially when the monthly expenses we would incur after an emergency event would most likely greatly exceed those of a typical month. I believe it critical that we maintain a minimum of six months operating cash on hand. I believe we need to re-think the methodology by which we calculate the reserve and insure that it is in line with the best practices of other government entities as well as those of lenders and risk evaluation firms."

For more information about David Hastings view his website.

Dan Liedtke

Updated: Dan Liedtke has refused to answer the question on this forum and is asking readers to view his answer in the FAQ section of his website.

Updated Feb. 22, 9:29 a.m.: Based on information from the candidate's website, here is a synopsis of his views on whether to use General Fund Reserves to meet the needs of the Operations Budget for running the city.

Liedtke stated that because of the economic downturn, he supports tapping "excess reserve funds," instead of cutting "police services" and "raising property taxes." The excess Liedtke refers to are the dollars above the goal of putting aside 25 percent of the previous year's general fund budget.

Liedtke states on his website that the city has at least $2 million more than what is required under the City Charter. Given the tough economic times, Liedtke believes leaders should consider using some of the reserves to address "immediate financial challenges."

Liedtke declined this week to respond in writing to Patch's "Question of the Week" posed to City Council candidates, referring this reporter to his website. Liedtke wrote on Monday in an email to Local Editor Cherlene Willis "due to so much negativity in the comments section," he does not want participate in the forum.

The next "Question of the Week" will run Monday or Tuesday.

 

Lynda February 22, 2012 at 02:04 PM
@goodguygreg. Usually when personal comments are made on this Patch, they are in some way relevant to the discussion at hand. Mtober's knowledge of Gulfport often provides interesting and useful information when she comments. I don't always agree with her conclusions, but I always appreciate her perspective. While she doesn't need anyone to defend her, I think your attempt to distract from the discussion of the candidates' answers is unfortunate.
mario cervantes February 22, 2012 at 05:15 PM
I ENCOURAGE MR.HASTINGS, MR.PERRY AND DR. SALMON TO STOP ANSWERING QUESTIONS ON THIS FORUM AND THE GABBER. THIS ELECTION FOR THE LIEDTKE SUPPORTERS ,IS PERSONAL.. MS. WILLIS AND MS. SALUSTRI ARE PART OF THE INNER CIRCLE OF FRIENDS THAT ARE PUSHING LIEDTKE.MS.WILLIS PROVED THAT BY TAKING DOWN MR.LIEDTKE'S ORIGINAL ANSWER AND MS. SALUSTRI BY HER SILENCE.YOU KNOW WHAT I AM SICK OF? MS.SALUSTRI, YOU STATED "NO ONE SEEMS TO BE WHO THEY ARE" START WITH YOURSELF. I HOPE, THAT BY GIVING THIS GROUP OF PEOPLE, ENOUGH ROPE THEY WILL HANG THEMSELVES. THIS IS NOT THE TIME FOR GREED, THIS IS THE TIME TO THINK OF EVERY PERSON WHO LIVES IN THIS CITY.MR. LIEDTKE DOES NOT CARE ABOUT YOU ME OR ANYONE ELSE. HE WANTS TO KEEP TAXES LOW BECAUSE HE LIVES IN A 1.2MILLION DOLLAR HOME, AND I SUSPECT, IF HE HAS TOO, SOONER OR LATER,GET RID OF THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, HE ,AFTER ALL, LIVES IN A GATED COMMUNITY WITH 24/7 SECURITY.HE SAYS HE WILL NOT RAISE TAXES,SO WHEN HE SPENDS THE RESERVES WHAT WILL HE GET RID OF? THE POLICE DEPARTMENT,THAT IS THE BIGGEST PART OF THE BUDGET.THE THREE COUNCIL PEOPLE WHO VOTED TO GET RID OF DISPATCH, DID THE RIGHT THING,THE DISPATCHERS,AS I UNDERSTAND IT, HAVE JOBS WITH THE PSO. THE BIGGEST PROBLEM I SEE ARE THE TWO REPORTERS WHO ARE PLAYING GAMES WITH THIS ELECTION AND ARE FAR FROM HONEST AND ETHICAL.IF THEY ARE TRYING TO FIND A FRIEND FOR MR. HENDERSON AND THE MAYOR ON COUNCIL, THE CITY WILL BE BANKRUPT FOR SURE. THINK WITH YOUR HEADS AND NOT YOUR EMOTIONS.
mtober February 23, 2012 at 01:52 AM
From above...Updated Feb. 22, 9:29 a.m.: Based on information from the candidate's website, here is a synopsis of his views on whether to use General Fund Reserves to meet the needs of the Operations Budget for running the city. Liedtke stated that because of the economic downturn, he supports tapping "excess reserve funds," instead of cutting "police services" and "raising property taxes." The excess Liedtke refers to are the dollars above the goal of putting aside 25 percent of the previous year's general fund budget. Liedtke states on his website that the city has at least $2 million more than what is required under the City Charter. Given the tough economic times, Liedtke believes leaders should consider using some of the reserves to address "immediate financial challenges." Liedtke declined this week to respond in writing to Patch's "Question of the Week" posed to City Council candidates, referring this reporter to his website. Liedtke wrote on Monday in an email to Local Editor Cherlene Willis "due to so much negativity in the comments section," he does not want participate in the forum.
Gulfporter February 23, 2012 at 03:44 AM
@Cherlene...so you have now posted the link to Liedtke's website three times. Is that the reward for unsportsmanlike conduct? ;-) Will this little game continue again next week or will you require everyone to play by the rules again ?
mtober February 29, 2012 at 03:11 AM
“I think we need to stop pretending we’re victims of the world economy. Let’s do the things we do.” – Dan Liedtke from the Town Shores Candidates Forum

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »