.

City Council To Light-Up Discussion On Proposed Beach Smoking Ban

Vice Mayor David Hastings has been the instigator behind a proposed city ordinance that would ban smoking on the beach. The ordinance is up for discussion by the City Council at a September 22, 2011 Workshop at 3:30 p.m.

When Gulfport Vice Mayor David Hastings took part in a beach cleanup back in July, one thing stood out in his mind that continues to bother him months later: the abundance of cigarette butts littering the beach. Just how bad was it? Hastings estimates while walking during the cleanup, “90% of what was being picked up was cigarette butts.” 

In an attempt to rid this eyesore, not to mention the possible hazards the butts could present to children, pets or wildlife, the vice mayor set to work with the city staff to craft a proposed ordinance designed to ban smoking on the beach. The proposed ordinance is now going-up for discussion at a City Council Workshop, Thursday, September 22, 2011, at 3:30 p.m. at Gulfport City Hall.

The ordinance calls for there to be a designated smoking area, perhaps as Hastings is thinking, in the parking lot adjacent to the beach. “Once they (the smokers) step on the sidewalk and start heading for the beach,” Hastings explained, that would be the beginning of the ban area for cigarette smoking or the use of any tobacco products. Although Hastings is an oral cancer survivor, he noted that this ordinance isn’t motivated by his medical history, but his desire to see an end to “the thousands of cigarette butts on the beach,” such as he witnessed during the cleanup project. 

While not everyone on the Council has publicly voiced his or her position on this proposed ordinance, at least one member has, that being Council Member Sam Henderson. Henderson, who has been a smoker on and off for years, and has currently stopped smoking, trying to kick the habit, agrees with the vice mayor that there are too many cigarette butts on the beach, but he is concerned about “people’s rights.” He is also particularly “irritated” with the vice mayor’s recent statement that, “All smokers are litter bugs.”  Henderson says in his many years of smoking he has always properly disposed of his cigarettes. However, he does agree with Hastings that many people presently smoking on the beach are not utilizing the receptacle cans available for their butts. 

What Henderson is especially concerned about in regards to the proposed ordinance is that it is too narrow in its focus. He said if the intent is to do a better job of cleaning up the city then “let’s pass a stronger litter law that addresses all kinds of litter not just cigarette butts.” When told Vice Mayor Hastings was for a more substantial fine for cigarette butt littering, perhaps as high as $200, Henderson said he would be okay with that, provided the ordinance with this new substantially higher fee would be for any kind of litter violation. The current fine for littering in the city is $97. 

One community, which has had great success with a smoking ban on the beach ordinance for the past several years, is Sarasota County. According to Carolyn Brown, interim general manager for Parks and Recreation in that county, the ordinance has been so well-received local cities there are following suit. 

“Both the city of Venice and the city of Sarasota have adopted their own no smoking ordinances for beaches within the municipalities.”  And she added, “I have no knowledge of any past or recent efforts to have the ordinance overturned. The Sarasota County Sheriff’s Office is responsible for enforcing the ordinance. Although I don’t have an exact number, but a lot of citations have been issued.” 

The bottom line for Sarasota County’s ordinance is that she believes the majority of people have complied and as a result since its passage back in late 2007, the amount of cigarette butts on any of the county park beaches has substantially diminished. Like the city of Gulfport’s current fine for littering, the Sarasota County’s citation for beach littering is $97. 

On a more local level, another municipality in Pinellas County, which is likely to bring up the idea of passing a smoking ban for its beach parks is the city of Indian Rocks Beach. However, City Manager Charles Coward says he expects any discussion about such an ordinance to be put out pretty quickly. Why? Because Florida Law, he stated, prevents local governments from enacting such ordinances.

Yet, this obviously hasn’t stopped other municipalities. Could Gulfport be next? Stay tuned.

Lynda September 22, 2011 at 12:38 PM
I really appreciate the research about Sarasota's ban. This is info that is useful in the discussion and not so easy for everyone to find out. Very similar to the info on the other cities that have outsourced dispatch. The Gulfport Patch and its research have helped me understand a number of local issues; it makes a real contribution to informed decision-making. Thanks.
Philip Penrose September 22, 2011 at 12:43 PM
I can't get to this meeting. Non-smoker here. Vote NO on beach smoking ban.
Cherlene Willis September 22, 2011 at 12:47 PM
Thank you Lynda! We want Gulfport Patch to be your go-to place for local news, events and conversation. Hope it's working :)
mtober September 22, 2011 at 04:35 PM
Agree with Lynda...your reporting on these topics has been great. I too am against a total ban as I don't see it being enforced. Unless that is resolved and there is a commitment to enforce other laws relating to litter, dogs, fires, etc. too then why bother putting another unenforced law on the books?
Marie Sykes September 23, 2011 at 12:29 PM
I think enforcement will be difficult! I moved to electronic cigarettes that don't have any waste, second-hand smoke and they taste the same. See: www.e-smokereviews.com for information about them and reviews of every brand.
CJ September 24, 2011 at 07:16 PM
Yeah...I tried those once but kept hearing radio stations from far away places playing in my ears....but only when my head was turned a certain way and I held one arm up. I was able to quit the smoking, but now I crave hearing the music. You can spot me in a crowd...I will be the one who looks like he is raising his hand for no reason.
Michael J. McFadden September 30, 2011 at 10:31 AM
"The ordinance calls for there to be a designated smoking area, perhaps as Hastings is thinking, in the parking lot adjacent to the beach." That's nice. Will there be a sign over it saying "Smokers Ghetto"? This is the sort of "compromise" that you often see offered by antismoking advocates when bans come up. But when you think about it, it's no compromise at all: it's *still* a total beach ban, AND, it's even worse: they want to herd the smokers into a specific ghetto even when they're not yet ON the beach. The "litter" problem is a real one, but the "threat to children" is nonsense: go to the poison control national stats sites and you'll find that 98% of all "tobacco product ingestion" calls occur in the HOME, and NONE of them kill any children. Compare that to aspirin, or liquor, or cleaning products or even suntan lotion. Butts on the beach are disgusting, but when they examined the problem in California about five years ago they found out that most of the butts were being washed in from storm sewer runoff of street-discarded butts caused by their smoking ban. When I emailed a very vocal "We need to do something about this butt litter" congresscritter and offered the suggestion that they move the smokers back inside of some of the bars and restaurants to reduce the litter problem,. I was, of course, ignored. The real motive had antismoking roots: not environmental ones. Michael J. McFadden, Author of "Dissecting Antismokers' Brains"

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something